Monitoring the Changing Beat of Healthcare

Articles


View List

Download File

MEDICAL BOARD ISSUES NEW RULES FOR ADMINISTERING, DISPENSING AND PRESCRIBING DRUGS

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

A new regulation, effective November 3, 1997, will affect every physician who writes prescriptions or administers or dispenses drugs. Physicians= obligations, when writing a prescription, or dispensing drugs in the office, are now codified to include an affirmative obligation to conduct an examination or evaluation of the patient=s condition before writing a prescription or dispensing a drug, and assurance that Aappropriate follow-up is provided and that the effects of the drug are properly evaluated and integrated into the treatment plan for the patient.@ Even greater regulatory standards and requirements are created for the prescription or dispensing of drugs scheduled as Acontrolled dangerous substances.@ Failure to strictly adhere to these complex and highly specific requirements can lead to disciplinary action, including loss of license. It will also create a new benchmark for plaintiffs= lawyers in malpractice actions.

INFORMATION REQUIRED ON WRITTEN PRESCRIPTIONS:

The new regulation also carries forward an obligation, rarely followed, but always at issue in disciplinary actions, that a practitioner include certain specific information on each written prescription. The information includes:

  1. The prescribing practitioner=s full name, address, telephone number and proper academic degree or identification of professional practice for which licensed;
  2. The full name, age and address of the patient;
  3. The date of issuance;
  4. The name, strength and quantity of the drug prescribed;
  5. Words, in addition to numbers, to indicate the drug quantity authorized if the prescription is for a Schedule II controlled substance, for example: ten (10) Percodan; or five (5) Ritalin 5 mg.;
  6. The number of refills permitted or time limit for refills, or both;
  7. The handwritten original signature of the prescribing practitioner;
  8. An explicit indication, by initials placed next to Ado not substitute,@ if it is the prescribing practitioner=s intention that a specified brand name drug be dispensed;
  9. The prescribing practitioner=s D.E.A. number, if the drug is a controlled substance; and
  10. Adequate instruction for the patient as to frequency; a direction of Ap.r.n.@ or Aif needed@ alone may be used if appropriate.

ADDITIONAL ADVICE TO PATIENTS WHEN PRESCRIBING:

Other requirements placed on physicians when writing a prescription include an obligation of a prescribing practitioner Ato advise each patient by adequate notice, for example, by a sign or pamphlet in the waiting room of the office, that the patient may request the practitioner to substitute a generic drug for any brand name drug prescribed.@ Further, Aeach practitioner shall use only written prescription blanks which shall be imprinted with the words >substitution permissible= and >do not substitute,= with a space for the prescribing practitioner=s initials next to the chosen option, and which shall not include preprinted information designed to discourage or prohibit substitution.@

DISPENSING MEDICATION FROM OFFICE SUBJECT TO SEVERE REGULATION AND RESTRICTION:

Physicians who dispense medication from their offices (including those who provide free samples) are now subject to stringent new requirements, clearly intended to deter them from dispensing, rather than writing a prescription. Keep in mind that the Board has broadly defined Adrug@ as meaning any article recognized in the official U.S. Pharmacopoeia, official Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the U. S. or official National Formulary, or any supplement to those sources, including, but not limited to, a controlled substance, a prescription legend drug, an over-the-counter preparation, a vitamin or food supplement, or any compounded combination of any of the above or transdermal patch or strip, intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment or prevention of disease or medical condition in humans or intended to affect the structure or function of the human body. For purposes of the new regulation, dispensing is defined as the distribution of drugs for the personal use of a patient and does not include the in-office administration of drugs by way of injection, vaccine, allergenic extract or nebulized preparation, or the provision of multiple dose vials of injectable medications.

Physicians who dispense drugs in the office are now officially obligated:

Ato maintain those drugs in an area kept in an orderly and sanitary manner, and in accordance with standard pharmaceutical practice and manufacturer recommendations concerning storage conditions, including refrigeration, where necessary. A practitioner shall not maintain in inventory any drugs which are outdated, misbranded, deteriorated, adulterated, recalled, unlabeled, damaged, discontinued or which were previously dispensed to a patient.@

Not only must physicians who dispense medication adhere to these strict standards, as if they were a pharmacy, but they face serious additional obstacles, as well. These include a requirement that the disposal of any drugs must comply with all local, State and Federal requirements and not pose a health hazard. In addition, all drugs dispensed must be recorded in the applicable patient record and must also be recorded in a permanent, contemporaneous dispensing log. Drug samples which are not controlled substances and which are packaged and labeled by the manufacturer, however, need be recorded only in the patient record, not the dispensing log. With this one exception, the dispensing log must include, at a minimum, the full name of the patient, the complete name of each drug dispensed, the strength and quantity of the drug dispensed, instructions as to the frequency of use, the date of dispensing, and the identity of the dispensing practitioner, if more than one practitioner dispenses in the office.

Each different drug dispensed, in whatever dosage form, except manufacturer packaged and labeled samples, must also be placed in a separate container with a safety closure cap (unless the patient requests otherwise), and include the full name of the patient, a list of the ingredients if the drug was compounded, not manufactured, the date of dispensing, and the identity of the dispensing practitioner. Whether prepackaged or not, a legible label must also be provided which includes the complete name of the drug dispensed, the strength and quantity of the drug dispensed, instructions as to the frequency of use, special precautions, as appropriate, and the expiration date of the drug.

The regulation (implementing state statutory requirements) prohibits a practitioner from charging any patient a fee for a drug packaged and labeled by a manufacturer as a sample, and for drugs, other than samples, the physician can charge a fee only sufficient Ato allow for a recoupment of a portion of overhead and administrative costs,@ which fee shall not exceed the actual acquisition cost plus ten percent. AActual acquisition cost@ means the cost actually incurred by the physician in acquiring a drug from a supplier and does not include any amounts charged by any entity in which the practitioner has a direct or indirect financial or other beneficial interest.

Moreover, as required by statute, if any fee, at all, is charged for the medication, either directly or indirectly, no more than a seven day supply of the drug may be dispensed, the patient must be advised as to the alternative availability of the drug outside of the practitioner=s office, and the actual acquisition cost of the drug to the practitioner must be disclosed to the patient, both in advance of purchase and again on the bill. The Board has reserved on the proposed provision that would have also prohibited the dispensing of a drug at a frequency greater than once every sixty (60) days (intended to prevent sequential distributions for seven-day periods). The requirements set out in this paragraph do not apply if the office at which the dispensing occurs is ten or more miles from the nearest pharmacy, if the drug is dispensed pursuant to an oncological or AIDs protocol, if the drug is a salve, ointment or drops, or if the drug is dispensed in, and directly related to, the services rendered to the patient at a hospital emergency room, a student health center or a publicly subsidized community health center, family planning clinic or prenatal clinic.

LIMITS ON PRESCRIBING, DISPENSING OR ADMINISTERING CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES:

Further, and of great significance is the requirement that when prescribing, dispensing or administering any controlled substance, a physician must Aensure that a patient=s medical history has been taken and physical examination accomplished, including an assessment of physical and psychological function, underlying or coexisting diseases or conditions, any history of substance abuse and the nature, frequency and severity of any pain.@ In addition, the medical record must reflect:

  1. A recognized medical indication for the use of the controlled substance;
  2. The complete name of the controlled substance;
  3. The dosage, strength and quantity of the controlled substance; and
  4. Instructions as to frequency of use.

A physician is prohibited from prescribing or otherwise authorizing Schedule II controlled substances in a quantity calculated to exceed 120 dosage units or a 30-day supply, whichever is less. (The Board provides no reason why it permits a physician to write 120 10mg dosages of a Schedule II controlled substance, BID, but prohibits issuance of 240 dosages of 5mgs of the same substance QID).

PAIN MANAGEMENT EXCEPTION:

A physician may exceed the 120 dose, 30 day supply restriction if he is following a treatment plan Adesigned to achieve effective pain management which has been tailored to the needs of a patient who is suffering pain from cancer, intractable pain or terminal illness.@ In such cases, the treatment plan must state objectives by which treatment success is to be evaluated, such as pain relief and improved physical and psychological function, and shall indicate if any further diagnostic evaluations or other treatments are planned. The physician is also obligated Ato discuss the risks and benefits of the use of controlled substances with the patient, guardian or authorized representative.@

More regulations apply when controlled substances are continuously prescribed for management of pain for three months or more. These restrictions do not seem to be limited to Schedule II substances. They include requirements that the physician:

  1. Shall review, at a minimum of every three months the course of treatment, any new information about the etiology of the pain and the patient=s progress toward treatment objectives;
  2. Shall remain alert to problems associated with physical and psychological dependence; and
  3. Shall periodically make reasonable efforts, unless clinically contraindicated, to either stop the use of the controlled substance, decrease the dosage, try other drugs such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, or treatment modalities in an effort to reduce the potential for abuse or the development of physical or psychological dependence.

Where treatment objectives are not being met the physician is obligated to assess the appropriateness of continued treatment with controlled substances or undertake a trial of other drugs or treatment modalities. In addition, an affirmative obligation exists to consider referring the patient for independent evaluation or treatment. The physician is also officially advised to Aremain alert@ to the possibility that the controlled substances may be misused or diverted B continuing the stigma currently attached to all chronic pain patients.

When controlled substances are prescribed for management of pain, records must also include copies of evaluations and consultations, a record of treatment plan objectives, evidence of informed consent, any agreements with the patient, and periodic reviews conducted.

PROHIBITIONS ON DRUGS FOR DETOXIFICATION AND USE OF AMPHETAMINES, SYMPATHOMAMETIC AMINES, AND ANABOLIC STEROIDS:

Additional stringent rules apply to the use of narcotic drugs intended for purposes of detoxification or maintenance treatment, the use of amphetamines and sympathomametic amines, and the use of anabolic steroids in the treatment of patients. Physicians engaged in use of these drugs should consult N.J.A.C. 13:35-7.7 and 7.8 for specific requirements. It should be noted, however, that the Board broadly and, incorrectly, defines amphetamines and sympathomametic amines as Aa[ny] drug which, chemically and pharmacologically, acts as a central nervous system stimulant.

Appellate Division Upholds Right to Arbitrate Medical Malpractice Cases - But Only After Overcoming Huge Hurdle, August 2010

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

OPMC Consequences of Improper Delegation, August 2010

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Top Reasons Physicians Are Sued for Malpractice, August 2010

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

More Stupid Regulations, July 2010

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Physician Legal Alert: RAC Audits and How Physicians Should Prepare, June 2010

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq. and Stacey Lipitz Marder, Esq.

An End to Class Action Abuse?, April 2010

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Is it Time to Opt Out of Medicare?, April 2010

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Ranking State Medical Boards, Are the Best Really the Worst?, April 2010

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Understanding the Process of Selling a Medical Practice, April 2010

by: Mathew J. Levy, Esq. and David N. Vozza, Esq.

Understanding the Negotiation of Managed Health Care Contracts, April 2010

by: Mathew J. Levy, Esq. and David N. Vozza, Esq.

An End to Malpractice Trials, March 2010

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Physicians as Targets: Insights, Hard Realities and How to Risk Manage Them, March 2010

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

White Paper - Physicians' Rights Issues the Misreading and Misapplication of New York State Insurance law §3224-b by New York Health Plans, November 10, 2009

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq. and David N. Vozza, Esq.

Abusing the False Label of “Disruptive” in Today’s Medicine, November 2009

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Physician Legal Alert: Risk Management One Day a Year, November 2009

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Who's Stealing From the Sample Closet?, October 2009, Contributor

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Supply - Demand and the A.M.A., September 2009

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Continued Erosion of the Medical Profession: We Need to Stop the Bleeding, August 2009

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Rationing Healthcare: Who Decides When to Pull the Plug on Grandma?, August 2009

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

The Heat's Getting Hotter: Healthcare Prosecutions to Rise Dramatically, August 2009

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Is the New Joint Commission Mandate that Healthcare Institutions Address Disruptive Behaviors an Appropriate Standard?, May & June 2009, Contributor

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Red Flag Rules Redux, May 15, 2009

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Hospital Responsible for Patient's Surgical Bill Where Doctor Doesn't Participate with Patient's Insurance Plan, April 20, 2009

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Governor Corzine Signs Legislation Amending Facilities Licensing Law and Codey Law, April 2009

by: Robert J. Conroy, Esq. and Denise L. Sanders, Esq.

Electronic Health Records. Will it Reduce Malpractice Claims?, March 2, 2009

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

New "Red Flag Rules" Apply to Physician Practices, March 24, 2009

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Exclusive Contracts Between Hospitals And Physicians Under Scrutiny After Decision By Federal Appeals Court, February 2009

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

No Class In Class Action Litigation, February 2009

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

I'm Not Sorry for Not Saying I'm Sorry, January 23, 2009

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Physician Legal Alert: "New Red Flag Rules" & Physician Practices, Fall 2009

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Physician Legal Alert: Abuse, Abandonment, Cruelty and Neglect: Pediatrics Reporting Obligations in New Jersey, Winter 2009

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Whose Side Are They On?, December 16, 2008

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Medical Board Attacked from Former Insider. November 18, 2008

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Patient Testimonials - More Risk than Reward?, June 2008

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Physicians' Best Chance for Power, June 2008

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Another Blow to Ambulatory Care Centers, May 22, 2008

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Fewer Stark Changes Than Expected - But Still Significant, February 22, 2008

by: Denise L. Sanders, Esq.

White Paper - Physicians' Rights Issues Under the Office of Professional Medical Conduct State of New York, January 18, 2008

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq. and Ralph A. Erbaio, Jr., Esq.

Beware of, and Be Ready for, The New Stronger, Office of Professional Medical Misconduct, Fall 2008

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Physician Legal Alert: The Coming Threat of RAC Audits and How to Avoid Them, Winter 2008

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

The Hidden Threats, and New Realities of Medical Staff By Laws, Spring 2008

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Nurses in a Retail Setting: The Risks to a Supervising Physician, December 2007

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Appellate Division Upholds Gross Receipts Tax on Ambulatory Care Centers, November 2007

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

More Ways to be Sued-New Informed Consent Forms Required for Physician Protection, November 2007

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Compliance Programs - A Preemptive Strike, November 2007

by: Daniel G. Giaquinto, Esq.

Understanding the Retail Based Clinic Debate, November 2007

by: Mathew J. Levy, Esq.

DOBI Adopts New PIP Medical Fee Schedule - Many Physicians Unhappy, September 2007

by: Denise L. Sanders, Esq.

Anti - Physician Acronyms, July - September 2007

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Understanding the Issues Related to Concierge Medicine, September 2007

by: Mathew J. Levy, Esq.

From PIP ARB to Penitentiary, August 2007

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq. and Daniel G. Giaquinto, Esq.

Dealing with the Long-Term Drug Dependent Patient, May 2007

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Let’s Go To The Video Tape Board of Medical Examiners Eviscerates Chaperone Rule Protections, Responding to Patients Personal Crises May be Punishable Boundry Violation, May 2007

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Yes, There is Justice!, April 2007

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Federal Tools To Combat Health Care Fraud and Abuse, April 2007

by: Daniel G. Giaquinto, Esq.

How Physicians Won-Acting Together, and Without Litigation - A New Approach?, February 2007

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Expect More From Your Residents - A Court Will, January 2007

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

New Jersey Residents Held to Higher Standard of Care, January 2007

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

New York Enacts New Law Requring Accreditation of Office Based Surgical Practices, Fall 2007

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Retrospective Audits: How to Avoid Them, Winter 2007

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq. and Mathew J. Levy, Esq.

Do We Need Specialized Courts?, November 20, 2006

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

The Criminalization of Medicine, November 13, 2006

by: Daniel G. Giaquinto, Esq.

Litigation of Hospital Medical Staff Matters, October 24, 2006

by: Robert J. Conroy, Esq.

A Step in the Right Direction for Managed Care Reform, But..., October 2006

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Office Based Surgery Audits - a.k.a. The Facility Fee Fight, September 2006

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq. and Mathew J. Levy, Esq. and Ralph A. Erbaio, Jr., Esq.

New Jersey Hospital Medical Staffs and Medical Staff Peer Review Litigation, August 2006

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq. and Robert J. Conroy, Esq.

Hidden Issues in the Need for Tort Reform, April & May 2006

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

A Physician's Primer for the 2006 Office of Inspector General's Work Plan, Spring 2006

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

How Physicians Can, and Must, Protect Themselves, Summer 2006

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Understanding Physician Employment Contracts, October 2005

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq. and Mathew J. Levy, Esq.

What If? Can your office make a comeback from disaster?, September 2005

by: Robert J. Conroy, Esq.

Understanding Partnerships Limited Liability Companies & Corporations, July/August 2005

by: Mathew J. Levy, Esq.

Risk Reduction Measures Against OPMC Actions, July 2005

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Overzealous Investigators Placing Physicians at Risk, February 2005

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Medicare Fraud Alert Misconceptions: The Path to Prison?, Fall 2005

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq. and Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Risk Reduction Measures Against State Board Actions, Fall 2005

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Understanding Estate Planning and Wills, Spring 2005

by: Mathew J. Levy, Esq.

Physician Risk Management in Fraud and Abuse, December 2004

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

HIPAA Compliance: The Law Reality, and Recommendations, October 2004

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq. and Denise L. Sanders, Esq.

Physicians Win Lawsuit, September 2004

by: Mathew J. Levy, Esq.

Understanding Asset Protection and Family Limited Partnerships, September 2004

by: Mathew J. Levy, Esq.

Understanding Physician Lease Agreements & The Anti-Kickback Statue, May-June 2004

by: Mathew J. Levy, Esq.

An Introduction to the OIG's Compliance Guidelines, April 2004

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Physician Compliance with Government Investigations, January-February 2004

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Health Plans Versus Physicians: New Legal Threats, December 2003

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

The Need for OPMC Reform, September 2003

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Appellate Court Offers Best Reason for Tort Reform, June 30, 2003

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

New Supreme Court Rulings and Their Impact on Your Practice, June 2003

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Tort Reform-Statistics, Solutions and Strategies, June 2003

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

HHS Provides Further Modifications to HIPAA Privacy Rules as Deadlines Approach, September 2002

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

The Office of Professional Medical Conduct, June 2002

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

HIPAA Privacy Rules: The Future Impact for Physicians?, September 2001

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

HIPAA Privacy Rules Imposed As Mandatory for all Physicians, Summer 2001

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Sexual and Other Harassment in The Operating Room Setting, Winter 2001

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Medicare Fraud Alert Top Ten Ways to Avoid a Medicare Fraud Investigation, June 2000

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Physician Unions - The Myths and a Potential Truth, Summer 1999

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Searching For New Criminals for the Millennium?, May 1998

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Dramatic Increase In Numbers Of Medicare Audits

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

First Warrantless Searches - Now Jail!

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Flurry of Proposed Regulations and Legislation Likely to Create New Hardships for Physicians

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Government Investigations - How Bad Things Can Happen to Good Doctors

by: Robert J. Conroy, Esq.

Horizon Class Action Settlement Challenged by State Physicians

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

How Well Does the Insurance Company's Lawyer Protect Your Rights?

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq. and Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Managed Care Contracting Is Still A Dangerous Game

by: Michael J. Schoppmann, Esq.

Medical Board Issues New Rules For Administering, Dispensing and Prescribing Drugs

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Medical Economics: How Much Insurance Do You Need?

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

National Practitioner Data Bank Changes Affect Podiatrists

by: Denise L. Sanders, Esq. and Matthew R. Streger, Esq.

OIG Compliance Program for Individual And Small-Group Physician Practices

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq. and Denise L. Sanders, Esq.

OIG Rules Hospitals Can Pay Physicians for On-Call Services – Pits Hospital Against Medical Staffs for Uncompensated Care Dollars

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Organizing Physicians – Legal Issues

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Physicians Unions – Barriers – Alternatives

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq. and Robert J. Conroy, Esq.

Physicians Unions - The Solution or Just Another Problem

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq. and Robert J. Conroy, Esq.

Proposed Board of Medical Examiners Rule Could Close Many Ambulatory Surgery Centers

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq. and Denise L. Sanders, Esq.

Relationship Between Board Of Medical Examiners And Organized Medicine At All Time Low

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq. and Denise L. Sanders, Esq.

The Princess or the Talking Frog

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

Universal Health Care In New Jersey – On The Horizon

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.

What To Do When Your Partner Starts Acting Erratically?

by: Steven I. Kern, Esq.